Community Resource Assessment

Assessing Mifflin County’s needs and resources is an important part of CTC’s work.  We assess Mifflin County’s needs by administering the PA Youth Survey, conducting a community mail survey, and gathering archival data. We are now beginning to gather information on Mifflin County’s resources.

CTC is working with the United Way of Mifflin-Juniata, the Mifflin-Juniata Human Services Department, and Community Partnerships RC & D to conduct a Community Resource Assessment.  We have hired a Community Resource Assessment Coordinator to collect data on the community resources in Mifflin County.

Our Community Resource Assessment Coordinator, Kathy Crownover, has completed the Faith-Based Resource Assessment portion of this assessment.  She met with and interviewed 88 of the more than100 churches in Mifflin County and gathered information pertaining to worship times, facilities available, and services provided. Hard copy directories of this information will be available in 2008, but the online version can be viewed now at www.HousesOfWorshipDirectory.com.

Kathy has already begun working on the second part of our Community Resource Assessment, the Youth-Serving Agencies Resource Assessment.  She will be interviewing all of the agencies in Mifflin County that provide services or programming for youth.

When the youth-serving agency portion of our Community Resource Assessment is completed, we will begin planning for the next phase.

 
Social Norms Campaign

“The social norms approach has become one of the most talked about health promotion strategies in recent years. Known primarily for its application to college student drinking, it has become an increasingly popular topic among community and high school substance abuse prevention specialists who are looking for an evidence-based alternative to ineffective intervention strategies, or to supplement strategies with limited impact.

“For many years, prevention efforts were based entirely on reactive strategies. In other words, problem behaviors had to occur before remedial actions were taken, with much of this work focused on assessment and diagnosis, rehabilitation programs for users and addicts, counseling or workshop sessions for offenders, or community service punishments.” In contrast, Social Norms is a proactive strategy to address potential problems before they occurred.

Social Norms is an environment approach that focuses on community-wide changes. “Environmental approaches generally take two directions. One of these is based on strategies that seek to change institutional and public policy, creating barriers or restrictions to access and increasing punitive measures to reduce problem behavior. The other environmental approach, widely known as social norms, uses accurate information about the social context, in the form of positive group norms, to affect widespread behavior change.

“The social norms approach to health promotion evolved from research documenting college students' misperceptions about peer drinking norms. The initial study revealed a consistent pattern of misperceptions held by students regarding the norms of alcohol use among their peers. Specifically, students typically thought that the norms for both the frequency and the quantity of drinking among their peers were higher than they actually were. In addition, students generally believed that their peers were more permissive in their personal attitudes about substance use than was in fact the case (Perkins and Berkowitz, 1986).”

To decrease underage drinking, we must challenge the misperceptions of what is “normal” to lessen peer pressure to engage in risky behavior. Good choices begin with accurate information. We invite you to join us in our campaign to celebrate the fact that “Most kids don’t”. The goal of Mifflin County Communities That Care is to relay to the community exactly what the youth have told us about themselves. We choose to emphasize the positive – for example, that 72% of those surveyed in Oct 2005 said they did not drink in the past month. Our strategy is to encourage youth who may think that “everyone else drinks but me” to realize that they actually are in the majority if they don’t drink!
Contrary to what many people think, the youth “norm” in Mifflin County is that most youth do not drink. However, it is interesting what our misperceptions are. For example, at the Chamber of Commerce’s Business Expo in May 2006, we recruited a random sample of 22 adults to complete a survey of ours. One question we asked was “Of students in the Mifflin County School District high school, what percentage do you think have used alcohol (a full drink or more) during the past 30 days?” Twenty-one of these 22 adults vastly overestimated the percentage, and the highest estimate was that 85% drink. Our goal, therefore, is to correct false perceptions.

The information quoted above was excerpted from A Guide to Marketing Social Norms for Health Promotion in Schools and Communities, which is a publication of the National Social Norms Resource Center. Read more about it at these related links:

Hobart and William Smith Alcohol Education Project Social Norms 101 Primer

National Social Norms Resource Center

Most of Us campaign (Montana Model of Social Norms Marketing)

 
Community Needs Assessment

CTC uses the PA Youth Survey, a community mail survey, and archival data to determine our community’s needs.  Based on these needs, we develop a prevention plan that guides our work.

We administer the PA Youth Survey to 8th, 10th, and 12th grade students in the Mifflin County School District every other year.  Based on the information from our October 2005 survey, we have found that:

  • 28% of surveyed youth had had a full drink of alcohol in the past 30 days, which indicates regular use

  • 16% of surveyed youth reported binge drinking in the past 30 days

  • 60% of surveyed youth do not feel that drinking alcohol regularly is harmful

  • 75% of surveyed youth feel that adults would disapprove of underage drinking

  • 14 is the average age at which our youth have their first drink of alcohol

In addition to statistics on youth substance use, the PA Youth Survey also helps us determine our community’s risk and protective factors.  Risk factors are the factors in a community that may make it more likely for youth to get involved in problem behaviors, and protective factors are those factors in a community that help to buffer youth against problem behaviors.

Our Highest Risk Factors:

  • Community Disorganization – Our youth do not feel safe in their community.

  • Low Neighborhood Attachment – Our youth do not feel connected to their community.

  • Parental Attitudes are Favorable toward Substance Use and Antisocial Behaviors – Our youth feel that parents and other adults excuse substance abuse and negative behaviors and do not have consequences for them.  Even though this may not be true, this is what our youth perceive.

Our Protective Factors have been listed here.  The #1 protective factor, Belief in the Moral Order, is the strongest.  The #7 and #8 protective factors, Community and School Rewards for Prosocial Involvement, are the weakest.  This simply means that we must work to build up our #7 and #8 protective factors, so that more youth will be buffered against negative behaviors.